PUB files are capable of containing text and both bitmap and vector graphics data.Oct 1, Sadly there is no way to open a Microsoft publisher file on a Mac, until now Here are two websites that can convert Microsoft publisher files.For a while, nonprofit organizations' choice of office suites was limited to Microsoft Office or. Also, this format is widely used in Websites and Emails. It’s very popular file format used for different types of publications like newsletters, flyers, brochures, postcards, etc. PUB file extension represents Microsoft Publisher document file format.
What Is Similar To Microsoft Publisher Professional Publisher ThereUnfortunately, comparing office suites isn't an exact science. This does not really leave a market for Microsoft Publisher on the Macintosh computer, except for Macintosh users to be able to read a We will compare Microsoft Office 2003 Professional to OpenOffice.org 2.0 - or at least some key parts of these suites. Apple Pages can produce some quite spectacular documents very simply, and unless you are a professional publisher there’s really not the need to step up to PageMaker or InDesign. Should you consider OpenOffice? Will it make sense for your users and organization? What are the differences between these two office suites?Apple Pages can do pretty much everything Publisher can do So a Macintosh user has no need for Microsoft Publisher.These tools are also free, open-source, and often used with OpenOffice, although they need to be installed separately.There's more to both office suites, of course. We'll compare Outlook 2003 with Thunderbird (email) and Sunbird (calendar), made by the Mozilla Corporation. OpenOffice's Calc.-Email tools and calendaring are also a critical part of an office suite, but OpenOffice.org hasn't released any email or calendar software. OpenOffice's Writer.-An office suite just isn't an office suite without a spreadsheet, so we'll look at Excel 2003 vs. Included with.-We have to talk about Word Processors, of course, which means Microsoft's Word 2003 vs. As one of the world's most popular layout and design programs, Microsoft Publisher turns laypeople into amateur graphic designers. In fact, OpenOffice and Microsoft Office are similar enough that actual feature differences are likely to be just one of many factors in your decision making. Because we all have a limited amount of patience, we'll leave these comparisons for another article.There's more to office suites than feature lists. OpenOffice offers an equation editor called Math, while Microsoft Office offers Publisher 2003 for desktop publishing. To correspond to Microsoft's Visio, there's OpenOffice's Draw. PowerPoint 2003 is matched with Impress. If you have strongly held beliefs about the importance of private-sector research and development versus the desire to share information freely, we suspect that we're not going to be able to change your mind. Some people won't use any software tools that aren't freely distributed, while others refuse to buy generic medications because they want pharmaceutical companies to be rewarded for their research and development investments. Microsoft uses a much more tightly controlled commercial-license model, in which the sale of its software pays for professional programmers and project managers, testing, management, marketing and sales, and shareholder dividends.There are a lot of strong feelings behind the great open-source-versus-commercial-license debate. Cynical Corporate GreedheadsThe Microsoft philosophy is very different from OpenOffice's or Mozilla's, which use an open-source model in which software is jointly created, often by volunteers, and freely distributed, allowing anyone to use, redistribute, adapt, or improve their code. What's more, OpenOffice will run under Linux (as well as Solaris and BSD), and Linux runs much more effectively on old computers than Windows 2000 or XP. While Office 2003 requires Window 2000 or XP to run fully, OpenOffice will run on Windows 98. Office 2003 says its minimum spec is a Pentium 450 MHz with 256 MB of RAM, while OpenOffice lists a Pentium 166 MHz processor with 128 MB of RAM. Both platforms also offer comparable support for the Mac.OpenOffice offers better support for older computers than the latest version of Microsoft Office. While OpenOffice is said to be a bit slower, particularly in opening up complex documents in Microsoft's proprietary formats, the difference is negligible if you've purchased your computer in the last couple of years. Mac osx 1014 mojave does not work with adobe photoshop cs4The template documents are substantially different between the two suites, so those used to using pre-packaged layouts for documents or charts may need to make some adjustments.The same is true of Thunderbird and Outlook: going back and forth is pretty seamless. You can think of moving from MS Office to OpenOffice as if you were moving from Office 2000 to Office 2003: there are small differences, and users who have learned things by rote may need to be trained in the new software, but the concepts are all the same.More advanced features tend to differ between the two packages. In fact, they've take a lot of pages from Microsoft's book: in most ways the interfaces are nearly identical, down to the formula syntax in Excel/Calc. While previous versions of OpenOffice had a less polished interface, version 2.0 has taken a page from Microsoft's book, instituting a polished and relatively familiar user interface. Others may think those people are crazy and need to get a life.Anyone who has used Word or Excel will feel comfortable in Write and Calc. For some people, being able to carry around their personally configured office suite on a USB thumbdrive, portable hard drive, or iPod is life altering. It depends what you prefer.One final consideration for the IT staff types out there: because OpenOffice has much looser licensing requirements, you don't need to worry about installing unlimited copies around your office or for friends or partner organizations. It's easier to find Microsoft Office training and support, but it's likely to cost more. OpenOffice.org's support is more community driven, and generally free, with a documentation project and discussion forums led by volunteers. For now, none of the open-source calendar products, or those offered by the dozen or so Web 2.0 companies who have introduced calendars in the past year, can compete with Outlook for simplicity, usability, documentation, and support.There's more support for Microsoft Office 2003 than anyone can possibly use: dozens of books, official support from Microsoft itself, sanctioned support from people who have earned Microsoft licenses, professional call centers, and a Web full of sites that contain tips and guides for modifying, configuring, and using Office 2003 software. While Outlook is mature, stable, and easy to use, Sunbird is really not as of yet (Mozilla still lists it as Alpha). ![]() Microsoft has already announced some details of Office 2007, which will be released later this year. Predicting the future is always an iffy business, but we'll tell you what we know. It's like the dilemma that arises each time police officers are faced with a serial killer: should they alert people and possibly make the perp move on to another community, or should they keep their investigation quiet and zero in on the guy? There are strong arguments for both approaches.Of course, any commitment to a software package involves taking into account not just where they are now, but where they are going. It seems very likely that Microsoft, OpenOffice, and Mozilla are going to be around for a while. In addition, Mozilla (which guides the Thunderbird and Sunbird projects) announced that it had made around $70 Million in revenue last year. OpenOffice continues to gain strong backing from large sponsors, primarily Sun, though Google has also formally committed resources and it looks as though they will continue to strengthen their relationship with OpenOffice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJason ArchivesCategories |